Skip to main content

View Helpers - Custom Output Parser

I was reviewing some blade view code recently and decided it was too verbose. There were some long output statements that were duplicated throughout the view and that always signals a need to refactor or come up with a better method. So I wanted to share (or at least document) what I came up with here.

First, the issue: fields stored as boolean "0/1" in the database must be output in "Yes/No" format. Plus, if the field is blank (or null), that must be reflected as well. Add to that the uncertainty of whether the production Microsoft Azure database will return a string or integer value for 1 or 0.

This problem necessitates a blade statement like:

{{ $object->property === null || $object->property === "" ? "" : $object->property == 1 ? 'Yes' : 'No' }}

Like I said...verbose!

One solution might be to create a Laravel accessor for the boolean field in the model. But that would mean that if I want the actual boolean value, I'd have to add a getOriginal() method to the value to bypass the accessor. While this is okay, it can wreak havoc when other developers are trying to access a property and they don't realize there is an accessor in the model. Also, I'd have to write a separate accessor for every boolean property on every model in my project.

Instead, I created a Parse class in my app/Helpers folder that can perform a number of useful functions for my view. You can view this class here.

Then I added the Parse class to my config/app.php file under 'aliases':

        'Parse' => App\Helpers\Parse::class,

Here's the above statement simplified using the parser helper:

{{ Parse::yesNo($object->property }}

But because sometimes specifications change and form questions are asked in an opposite way from what was originally specified, I made a reverse parser, where a boolean 1 actually means 'No':

{{ Parse::noYes($object->property }}

Additionally, sometimes Yes and No don't cover every usage for a boolean field, so I made it possible to pass in other strings to replace 'Yes' and 'No':

{{ Parse::yesNo($object->property, 'Awesome!', 'Awful') }}

I hope this helps someone else out there looking for cleaner views! 😃

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

jQuery noUIslider Pip Label Customization

Recently, I was tasked with creating a slider element for a user to select their credit rating, of which the user can select from among: 'Poor', 'Fair', 'Good', 'Excellent' and 'Not Sure'.  Several problems presented themselves here: A drop-down box would be better, but that's not what the requirements specified. I already have several numeric sliders on my page and I want them all to match. I selected the jQuery noUi Slider library to create the numeric sliders. noUi Slider does not support string values - only numeric values. The "pips" (slider scale/labels) also does not support string values. Since the solution involved shifting my mindset, I wanted to document it here for future reference and maybe to help someone facing the same requirements. Here's my solution: Since there is really no numeric correlation to credit score (especially considering one of the options is "Not Sure"), I will just u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Regarding Technology (a departure from WebDev)

I'm departing from WebDev for a minute to blog about technology. I'm as guilty of over-indulging in technology as anyone, especially given that my career demands a technology overload. Today at noon is the solar eclipse and that prompted me to think about the past and the future. I started to think about where the world stands and a song came up on my playlist that seemed perfect for my mood. 27 years ago, Bad Religion wrote a song about the current generation of kids. It would be prophetic if it weren't for the fact that the trend had already begun back then. In any event, it seems now is a good time to look back at the lyrics: 'Cause I'm a twenty-first century digital boy I don't know how to live but I got a lot of toys My daddy's a lazy middle-class intellectual My mommy's on Valium, so ineffectual What child these days does not have multiple devices to play with? Gaming systems, television, computers and tablets are in nearly every home. Kid...
Post a Comment
Read more

Java...Still Sucking Hard, Compared to Other Languages

I know there are a bunch of Java devotees out there.  I frequently have them evangelizing the language to me as a "strongly-typed" language that is so much better than loosely-typed languages, like PHP.  So here is something that just came up for me and I'd like to ask all those devotees WHY they like the type enforcement. Here's a bit of code to store a random integer as a string in PHP: $myString = rand(5); And now...the Java version: String myString = String . valueOf ( Integer . valueOf ( Math . random () * 10000 )); I get it...you need to keep your phony-baloney job and writing more  code and making it more complicated can help you keep it out of the hands of less "intelligent" programmers. As for myself, I will always prefer a language that lets me write shorter, more eloquent code and get my applications built faster.  But then...maybe I'm just simple.
Post a Comment
Read more