Skip to main content

Nailing Down HTTP Methods

There has been some debate about when to use PUT versus PATCH versus POST in REST APIs. Having dealt with a variety of 3rd-party REST APIs now, I've become a little opinionated about how the various methods *should* be used. Here's my take:

The way I prefer to see PUT used is to submit a fully-formed replacement resource. In other words, if you are using PUT to update a resource, you probably will want to fetch the object from the resource initially, modify it and then PUT the entire modified object back to the resource.  If you are creating a new resource, use PUT only if you are creating your own resource ID (probably not a common use-case, since most resources will auto-assign their own IDs).


In contrast, PATCH can update any number of properties of a known resource without needing to submit the entirety of the resource. In most cases, PATCH is the right method for updates as it saves on bandwidth.

IMO, POST is the right method for creating a new resource, assuming IDs are auto-assigned. Note that POST doesn't need to know every property of a resource in order to create a new one, whereas PUT must. So if your client wants to start a transaction, for example, POST means they don't need to submit every property of a transaction to create one.  It makes life much easier on your client.

What this boils down to for me is that PUT should used only rarely for specific use-cases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

jQuery noUIslider Pip Label Customization

Recently, I was tasked with creating a slider element for a user to select their credit rating, of which the user can select from among: 'Poor', 'Fair', 'Good', 'Excellent' and 'Not Sure'.  Several problems presented themselves here: A drop-down box would be better, but that's not what the requirements specified. I already have several numeric sliders on my page and I want them all to match. I selected the jQuery noUi Slider library to create the numeric sliders. noUi Slider does not support string values - only numeric values. The "pips" (slider scale/labels) also does not support string values. Since the solution involved shifting my mindset, I wanted to document it here for future reference and maybe to help someone facing the same requirements. Here's my solution: Since there is really no numeric correlation to credit score (especially considering one of the options is "Not Sure"), I will just u

How to Create a new Case Record Type in Salesforce

Here are the specific steps for adding a case record type. Some steps may vary by organization but the process should be pretty similar to what is shown here. 1) Create a new page layout 2) Add any new case statuses to picklist 3) Edit case statuses that should indicate case is "closed" 4) Add any new case types to picklist 5) Add any new case reasons to picklist 6) Add any new case origins to picklist 7) Add any new fields to case object 8) Under Record Types, ensure the picklists have the correct values (i.e. - Reason/Type/Origin) 9) Within the Type field, edit "Reason" field dependencies matrix and add new reason(s) to types 10) Create a new support process (if not reusing an existing one) 11) Create the new record type (enable for all profiles) 12) Finalize the page layout (if needed) and check "Default" in Case Assignment checkbox under Layout Properties 13) Create approval queues (if needed) 14) Set up approv

View Helpers - Custom Output Parser

I was reviewing some blade view code recently and decided it was too verbose. There were some long output statements that were duplicated throughout the view and that always signals a need to refactor or come up with a better method. So I wanted to share (or at least document) what I came up with here. First, the issue: fields stored as boolean "0/1" in the database must be output in "Yes/No" format. Plus, if the field is blank (or null), that must be reflected as well. Add to that the uncertainty of whether the production Microsoft Azure database will return a string or integer value for 1 or 0. This problem necessitates a blade statement like: {{ $object->property === null || $object->property === "" ? "" : $object->property == 1 ? 'Yes' : 'No' }} Like I said...verbose! One solution might be to create a Laravel accessor for the boolean field in the model. But that would mean that if I want the actual boolean